Category: Philosophy
-
This assignment is about making an ethically sound decision on whether or not to transfer a patient to intensive care and provide life support, based on factors such as the patient’s directives, quality of life, family preferences, and moral and ethical considerations.
SHOULD WE WITHHOLD LIFE SUPPORT? THE MR. MARTINEZ CASE Reflect on the Case Study: Mr. Martinez media piece. Should Mr. Martinez be transferred to intensive care, where his respiratory failure can be treated by a ventilator, and by CPR if necessary, and his oxygen level can be monitored? Assume that doctors cannot contact Mrs. Martinez…
-
This assignment is an interpretive essay that explores the connections between the movie “Dark Knight” and the short story “The Destructors” by Graham Greene, using both primary and secondary sources to support the argument.
A two page minimum Interpretive essay. The REQUIRED readings are in the files and the files are as well. There is also a sample paper about the dark Knight as well. This over the movie Dark Knight. I have notes I have took from class about what he wants that gets more specific. I also…
-
This assignment is about revising and improving a previously submitted assignment based on feedback from the professor.
Details attached on file. I have attached my assignment 1 and the feedback i respond from my professor to edit. And also attached the guidelines of the assignment 1 and the rubric.
-
This assignment requires the student to compare and contrast the views of human nature and their consequences for the ideal polity in two philosophers or schools of philosophy, and analyze the implications for the legitimacy of revolutionary political change.
Prompt Select one philosopher or school of philosophy from Column A and one philosopher or school of philosophy from Column B, and respond to the following question: In our first class session we examined the concept of “political legitimacy” as an issue that is addressed implicitly or explicitly in the thought of every political philosopher,…
-
This assignment is about reflecting on an assigned reading using a specific framework.
First, be sure to do the assigned readings for this lesson. Then, using the following framework, reflect on that reading:
-
This 8-page project will examine the question of whether rules define morality, using chapter 7.4 of “Philosophy: A Text with Readings” as a reference.
8 page project on topic : Do rules define morality ? chapter 7.4. Introduction, body , conclusion and reference on APA 7 edit Velasquez, M (2017)Philosophy: A Text with Readings. (13th Ed.) Publisher: Cengage Print ISBN: 9781337237505, 1337237507 eText ISBN: 9781337010597, 1337010596
-
This assignment is about role-playing a murder mystery and using bonus information based on different roles to solve the mystery with fellow guildmates.
Instructions: I’ve made some adjustments to the Investigative Roleplay – How to Play! page found in the module. Your first task in this assignment is to decide who will play which role for this round. You can chose whether you want to be the: Observer: The Observer will gain bonus information based on the environment…
-
This assignment is about exploring the role of self-interest in ethical decision making and discussing examples of ethical behavior in the workplace, political decisions, and daily interactions.
Purpose The purpose of this discussion is to explore the extent to which ethical decisions may or may not be driven by self-interest and to clarify one’s own moral beliefs about ethical behavior. We make ethical decisions daily, and this discussion is especially relevant to decisions we make in our jobs and while living in…
-
This assignment is about the textbook “Philosophy: A Text with Readings” by Manuel Velasquez, 13th edition, published by Cengage, with print and eText ISBN numbers provided.
Velasquez, M (2017)Philosophy: A Text with Readings. (13th Ed.) Publisher: Cengage Print ISBN: 9781337237505, 1337237507 eText ISBN: 9781337010597, 1337010596
-
This assignment is about providing detailed reviews to three peers’ rough drafts for a debate paper.
preview the three peers’ rough drafts and provide the reviews to each drafts provide detailed reviews in the form of comments directly within your peer’s rough drafts similar. Do NOT just write things like, “This looks good” and copy it to each of the question rubrics. I will NOT give credit for these general sorts…