This assignment is about providing detailed reviews to three peers’ rough drafts for a debate paper.

preview the three peers’ rough drafts and provide the reviews to each drafts
provide detailed reviews in the form of comments directly within your peer’s rough drafts similar.
Do NOT just write things like, “This looks good” and copy it to each of the question rubrics. I will NOT give credit for these general sorts of statements!
answer all of the questions on the rubric provided for each peer review — be sure to read the rubric in detail before you begin!
Acceptable comments are things like:
Your thesis is well-stated within your introduction, which helps the reader understand your position of the debate. it’s straightforward and to the point.
Your introduction is very captivating! The introduction correctly follows the guidelines; however, it is missing a brief summary of the arguments you will be using and your thesis.
Each section contains its own subtitles and follows the correct guidelines. The body paragraphs for the first premise subtitle are very clear on communicating the central idea and clearly shows how it’s related to the thesis of the paper. There is valuable information communicating the central idea and is very intriguing.
I think that you could have a better counterargument as the one you have presented seems small in importance relative to the counterarguments many people would have.
There were some grammatical errors and missing references. The works cited page was not present but you probably were not able to finish. Your formal argument and title page were very well done and followed the guidelines!